Planer

  • Home
  • About
  • Privacy
  • Contact Me
Home Pearson or another to make a bid for RM?

Pearson or another to make a bid for RM?

RM is in the midst of a perfect storm –a plummeting share price (down almost 13% at lunchtime today),  falling sales, downgraded forecasts, savagely cost cutting, a weak currency and a management admission that,’ shareholders should anticipate a potentially difficult and unpredictable period in the near term’.  Add to this mix the growing chaos on international stock markets and you have an extremely volatile situation with two interlinked scenarios.

In the first you have a mini doomsday scenario, where frightened institutional investors, whose understanding of the education sector is generally pretty unsophisticated (at best), have been dumping RM’s shares thereby creating negative sentiment which is likely to drive the price down further. Such mob mentality is the fodder for short sellers, who are likely to be the only ones to have done well from RM recently.

Next is the interesting bit. Education is an increasingly global market, which has for several years been attracting interest from companies, institutional investors and private equity funds. These range from Capita, APAX, Apollo Group, Pearson and News Corp. to EDUCOMP, Cox & Kings, Blackstone, the Carlyle Group and even the Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan (who have $110bn in funds under management and their own private equity arm Teacher’s Private Capital).

These entities all share several common attributes; an international orientation, a long-term investment perspective (buy and build) and the financial capacity to do large deals without unduly worrying investors (or members). In short they are market makers at a time when RM is a market taker.

My view is that RM has been a takeover target for some time. They’re cheap (and getting cheaper) so it’s a matter of when not if a bid happens. Add all of this together along with the rumours  that have been circulating in the market for some time, and my conclusion is that Pearson is not just a potential suitor, but that they may well have been working (in secret) on a takeover for some time. Still not convinced, then consider these signs that I think make my hypothesis even stronger:

  • Profits at Pearson’s education division are up 30% to 135m, with particularly strong performance from their International Education Division inc. Wall Street English, TutorVista, CTI, SEB (Brazil) and Melorio
  • Pearson have access to capital for investment, indeed there may be money left over from the $2bn sale of Interactive Data Corporation in 2010
  • Pearson’s management have a strong business intelligence programme and will be well aware of the strengths and weaknesses of RM’s products and services
  • RM’s assessment business and some of their content divisions would be good fits for Pearson; they might even keep TTS (as it’s performing fantastically)

To test the rumour I put in calls to the press offices of both RM and Pearson at about 10.30am. At 11.50 AM a spokesman from Pearson’s Press office called and said, ‘we decline to comment and as a company never  comment on any rumours’. Fast, succinct and highly professional, exactly what I expect from such a large company. RM, on the other hand have yet to reply, and the lack of activity in their press office makes me wonder (and investors worry) whether their  senior management team is ‘away for the school holidays’?

If Pearson announce a bid (as I think they eventually will), this may well flush a rival bid(s) from some like Capita, but whatever happens the next few months will be interesting ones for RM and their investors.  Remember where you read it first!

www.apollogrp.edu

www.blackstone.com

www.capita.co.uk

www.carlyle.com

www.educomp.com

www.newscorp.com

www.ottp.com

www.pearson.com

www.rm.com

Disclaimer: The opinions, information and materials provided on this website are for general information purposes.  It is not investment advice nor can it take account of your own particular circumstances.  If you require any advice on investments, you should contact a financial or other professional adviser.  No material in this website is an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any investments. The author holds no shares in either RM Plc or Pearson Plc, nor does he have any direct financial or business relationship with them.
© Richard Taylor 2011
Aug 5, 2011Richard Taylor
11 years ago Education0
Richard Taylor
Apollo Group pay $75m for Carnegie LearningKip McGrath - punt, bunt or bury?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Archives
  • December 2022 (1)
  • November 2022 (1)
  • September 2022 (1)
  • July 2022 (2)
  • June 2022 (2)
  • April 2022 (1)
  • March 2022 (2)
  • February 2022 (1)
  • September 2021 (2)
  • August 2021 (2)
  • July 2021 (1)
  • June 2021 (1)
  • May 2021 (2)
  • March 2021 (1)
  • January 2021 (2)
  • November 2020 (1)
  • October 2020 (2)
  • July 2020 (1)
  • June 2020 (1)
  • April 2020 (1)
  • January 2020 (2)
  • November 2019 (1)
  • September 2019 (1)
  • July 2019 (1)
  • June 2019 (2)
  • May 2019 (1)
  • March 2019 (1)
  • January 2019 (1)
  • May 2018 (1)
  • June 2017 (1)
  • May 2017 (2)
  • April 2017 (1)
  • March 2017 (1)
  • February 2017 (4)
  • January 2017 (1)
  • December 2016 (1)
  • November 2016 (2)
  • May 2016 (4)
  • April 2016 (1)
  • February 2016 (1)
  • January 2016 (1)
  • January 2015 (1)
  • May 2014 (2)
  • April 2014 (2)
  • March 2014 (2)
  • February 2014 (5)
  • October 2013 (1)
  • September 2013 (2)
  • August 2013 (1)
  • July 2013 (1)
  • June 2013 (2)
  • May 2013 (4)
  • April 2013 (2)
  • February 2013 (3)
  • January 2013 (3)
  • September 2012 (2)
  • August 2012 (2)
  • April 2012 (1)
  • February 2012 (3)
  • November 2011 (1)
  • October 2011 (2)
  • September 2011 (5)
  • August 2011 (5)
  • July 2011 (2)
  • June 2011 (2)
  • May 2011 (1)
2014 © Media Taylor